Skip to content

Conversation

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

cc #3913

Tests for the tracking issue. This commits can be cherry-picked for fixing these issues.

@flip1995
Copy link
Member Author

Failures: https://travis-ci.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/jobs/191751335#L1226-L1538

Closing this PR to keep the queue clean. This can be reopened to rerun Travis.

@flip1995 flip1995 closed this Apr 10, 2019
@flip1995
Copy link
Member Author

lets see if #4082 has fixed the identity conversion bug

@flip1995 flip1995 reopened this May 12, 2019
@flip1995
Copy link
Member Author

Yes identity conversion is fixed!
https://travis-ci.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/jobs/199515830#L1474-L1476

failures:
    [ui] ui/explicit_iter_loop_no_sugg.rs
    [ui] ui/into_iter_on_array_in_for_loop.rs

@flip1995 flip1995 reopened this May 12, 2019
@flip1995 flip1995 force-pushed the test_rustup_breakage branch from fd13cb7 to 2420eab Compare May 12, 2019 19:34
@flip1995 flip1995 closed this May 12, 2019
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2019
Add regression test for identity_conversion FP

cc #3913 #4082 #3936

changelog: none
@flip1995
Copy link
Member Author

I think 19e852c is also fixed.

@flip1995 flip1995 reopened this Jun 14, 2019
@flip1995
Copy link
Member Author

Nice everything is fixed. The tests for this already exist in

for _ in [1, 2, 3].into_iter() {} //~ ERROR equivalent to .iter()

error: this .into_iter() call is equivalent to .iter() and will not move the array
--> $DIR/into_iter_on_ref.rs:13:24
|
LL | for _ in [1, 2, 3].into_iter() {} //~ ERROR equivalent to .iter()
| ^^^^^^^^^ help: call directly: `iter`
|

and
for _v in vec.iter() {}

error: it is more concise to loop over references to containers instead of using explicit iteration methods
--> $DIR/for_loop.rs:107:15
|
LL | for _v in vec.iter() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^ help: to write this more concisely, try: `&vec`
|
= note: `-D clippy::explicit-iter-loop` implied by `-D warnings`

@flip1995 flip1995 closed this Jun 14, 2019
@flip1995 flip1995 deleted the test_rustup_breakage branch June 14, 2019 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant